A distinction without a difference is an informal fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.

For example, a person might say "I did not lie; I merely stretched the truth a little bit."

Form of the fallacy

• Claim X is made where the truth of the claim requires a distinct difference between A and B.

• There is no distinct difference between A and B.

• Therefore, claim X is incorrectly claimed to be true.

Example

In the following conversation:

• Sergio: There is no way I would ever even consider taking dancing lessons.

• Kitty: How about I ask my friend from work to teach you?

• Sergio: If you know someone who is willing to teach me how to dance, then I am willing to learn, sure.

Sergio's fallacy is thinking that being taught by someone is different than taking a lesson.

See also

• Connotation

• Connotation (semiotics)

• Distancing language

• Euphemism

• False dilemma

• Spin (propaganda)

References